- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:21:21 +0100
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Cc: Greg Dean <dean.greg@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On mån, 2008-10-20 at 13:52 -0700, Greg Dean wrote: > > > > Transfer-Encoding: chunked > > Estimated-Content-Length: 300000 > > > This would allow for the recipient of such a message to prepare for a > > message of a certain size. > > Looks useful to me, for the reasons you outlined and a bunch more. See > for example the NTLM auth chunked discussion a year ago or so.. > > For responses it's meaningful even without chunked. > > I don't see anything wrong with it, especially not with the length being > an estiamte and not the exact expected lenght. In some circumstances you may be able to refine the estimate as the message is being transmitted. Chunk extensions ("chunk-extension") would suit that: 1000;estimated-remaining=299000 (1000 bytes) 1000;estimated-remaining=298000 (1000 bytes) I don't know if chunk extensions break in the real world, though. -- Jamie
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 22:21:58 UTC