- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:35:09 +0200
- To: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Helge Hess wrote: > > Hm, I wonder whether we could just use a different header, NOT location. > Something like this: > > PUT /new.txt > Accept-Relocation: same-col, same-server, full > > HTTP/1.x 201 Created > Relocation: /123.txt > > would that possibly work for everyone? It's just a new request header that modifies the behavior of PUT to do something else-but-similar. And, again, how does a client find out about the request-URI? You will need If-None-Match: * to avoid unintentional overwrites on /new.txt, but as soon as you include it, a conforming server will have to reject the request with 412 if /new.txt is already taken. How exactly is that better than POST, which already can have that semantics? BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 20 October 2008 20:35:54 UTC