fre 2007-12-28 klockan 18:36 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > Henrik Nordström wrote: > > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 17:19 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > > > >> Hm. Do you really think it's SHOULD NOT, not MUST NOT? > > > > My starting point is SHOULD NOT for anything which does not cause > > immediate interoperability breakage. > > > > If diskussions find that violating this is really harmful, not only > > slightly confusing to the unsuspecting then upgrade the criteria to MUST > > NOT. > > > > It depends a bit on what the wording regarding error handling will be. > > Well, if conflicting information in Content-Length headers doesn't cause > interop problems, what will? Was thinking more on a general rule covering single-valued headers in general, just to emphasis what the BNF says. For Content-Length it should be a MUST NOT, but the more interesting topic to discuss there is how recipients should react when receiving a message with multiple content-length values. Regards Henrik
Received on Friday, 28 December 2007 20:53:37 UTC