- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:36:00 +0100
- To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Henrik Nordström wrote: > fre 2007-12-28 klockan 17:19 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke: > >> Hm. Do you really think it's SHOULD NOT, not MUST NOT? > > My starting point is SHOULD NOT for anything which does not cause > immediate interoperability breakage. > > If diskussions find that violating this is really harmful, not only > slightly confusing to the unsuspecting then upgrade the criteria to MUST > NOT. > > It depends a bit on what the wording regarding error handling will be. Well, if conflicting information in Content-Length headers doesn't cause interop problems, what will? BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 28 December 2007 17:36:31 UTC