Re: i93: Repeating Single-value headers

Henrik Nordström wrote:
> fre 2007-12-28 klockan 17:19 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> Hm. Do you really think it's SHOULD NOT, not MUST NOT?
> My starting point is SHOULD NOT for anything which does not cause
> immediate interoperability breakage.
> If diskussions find that violating this is really harmful, not only
> slightly confusing to the unsuspecting then upgrade the criteria to MUST
> NOT.
> It depends a bit on what the wording regarding error handling will be.

Well, if conflicting information in Content-Length headers doesn't cause 
interop problems, what will?

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 28 December 2007 17:36:31 UTC