- From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:34:49 +0100
- To: Franklin Tse <peaceable_whale@hotmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 05:35:04 UTC
On mån, 2007-12-10 at 13:17 +0800, Franklin Tse wrote: > So, should the base URI feature be marked as obsolete or deprecated? Not entirely sure what the conclusion was the last time this was discussed some months ago.. It's a nice feature, helping unifying the URL-namespace on the server. But browser vendors do not dare implementing it due to there being a handful number of noticeably broken servers out there sending invalid/nonworking Content-Location headers. (mostly caused by rewriting reverse-proxies not noticing the existence of Content-Location) Opera tried, but backed out again due to customer complains blaiming Opera.. And no, there isn't really any good alternatives. It's true that HTML and XML has alternatives, but that's within the content itself. For example you can't add a HTML base href to a PDF document. Regards Henrik
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 05:35:04 UTC