Re: Intro to Methods making Host header requirement

Julian Reschke wrote:
>> The text in 9 should be moved to "5.3 Request Header Fields" where
>> it belongs, or deleted.

> And, as a matter of fact, we may need all the big sticks we have for 
> some other issues :-)

Make sure that you don't lose the MUST in section 9.  Out of curiosity,
what's the intended status for 2616bis, STD, DS, PS, or "let's see what
happens" ?


Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 08:33:53 UTC