- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:56:20 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Prior to this WG starting up, there was an HTTP errata list maintained at <http://skrb.org/ietf/http_errata.html>. The issues against RFC2616 listed there are reflected as i1 to i18 in the current list <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/ issues/>. We've all been looking at them a while, but please have one more look through and make sure you're comfortable with the resolutions proposed; if I don't hear anything in the next two weeks, I think we'll have consensus on those resolutions*, and can move on. Cheers, * I'm primarily talking about the resolutions of the "design" issues -- i.e., those requiring some interpretation of the spec. Some of them may be overridden by later updates (e.g., i11 is probably going to be blown away by an updated reference to RFC3986); my interest for now is getting these out of the way, so don't worry about that for now. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 12 November 2007 12:59:28 UTC