- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:27:54 +0200
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Martin Duerst wrote: > ... > As for issue #20, it's definitely very related, but the commenter > (Mark) is most concerned about interaction with other specs, whereas > my main point is interaction with reality. I'll leave it to the editing > team to decide whether they want to handle this as one or two issues, > but if you handle it as one issue, please add my comment text > (not necessarily the point about the US-ASCII default for text/...xml) > to the issue description. > > Regards, Martin. >... OK, I have added your comment in <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html>, but did not add another issue. Related to this, is anybody aware of any progress in revising RFC3023? I thought there was consensus years ago that the text/*+xml defaulting needs to be revised... Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:28:12 UTC