- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:28:00 +0900
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
First, when I looked at the updated draft, I was assuming that all issues appear therein. Apparently not. What's the criterion for showing them in the draft? If they have been accepted/implemented? Or something else? As for issue #20, it's definitely very related, but the commenter (Mark) is most concerned about interaction with other specs, whereas my main point is interaction with reality. I'll leave it to the editing team to decide whether they want to handle this as one or two issues, but if you handle it as one issue, please add my comment text (not necessarily the point about the US-ASCII default for text/...xml) to the issue description. Regards, Martin. At 23:58 07/10/05, Julian Reschke wrote: >Martin Duerst wrote: >> Dear HTTP experts, >> Here is another issue that apparently hasn't yet been listed. > > ... > >Isn't that... <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i20>? > >Best regards, Julian #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2007 05:29:49 UTC