Re: NEW ISSUE: NO default charset

First, when I looked at the updated draft, I was assuming that all issues
appear therein. Apparently not. What's the criterion for showing them in
the draft? If they have been accepted/implemented? Or something else?

As for issue #20, it's definitely very related, but the commenter
(Mark) is most concerned about interaction with other specs, whereas
my main point is interaction with reality. I'll leave it to the editing
team to decide whether they want to handle this as one or two issues,
but if you handle it as one issue, please add my comment text
(not necessarily the point about the US-ASCII default for text/...xml)
to the issue description.

Regards,    Martin.

At 23:58 07/10/05, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Martin Duerst wrote:
>> Dear HTTP experts,
>> Here is another issue that apparently hasn't yet been listed.
> > ...
>
>Isn't that... <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i20>?
>
>Best regards, Julian


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

Received on Saturday, 6 October 2007 05:29:49 UTC