- From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:33:05 -0800 (PST)
- To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
- cc: "Travis Snoozy (Volt)" <a-travis@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > But yes, poor reading of the RFC may cause problems if one assumes > 13.5.2 is complete and alone authoritative on when headers may be > modified. Fairly commonly paired with poor writing ... and also with large complex documents. The goal of inter-operative implementations is best served by clarification or removal of ambiguity when it is detected. This document if for engineers who find life challenging enough w/o ambiguity, not lawyers who love ambiguity. Dave Morris
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 14:33:31 UTC