- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:50:31 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Added: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i48 On 2006/11/20, at 6:19 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > Currently, RFC2616 says about the date format for the "Date" header > (<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.18>): > > "The field value is an HTTP-date, as described in section 3.3.1; it > MUST be sent in RFC 1123 [8]-date format." > > It seems to me that this should really say: > > "The field value is an HTTP-date, as described in section 3.3.1; it > MUST be sent in rfc1123-date [8] format." > > (because it refers to the "rfc1123-date" grammar production) > > Best regards, Julian > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 00:50:38 UTC