- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:06:26 +0100
- To: "Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)" <yngve@opera.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) schrieb: >> The header allows relative URIs, so it seems to me it would be safe >> for user agents to support the header if - for instance - it's an >> absolute path. That should still cover the majority of the use cases... > > Sorry, Julien. Won't work. > ... Understood. But please understand I said "majority" not "all". If we'd remove all HTTP features that *some* sites get wrong, where would that end? And, btw, would RoyF's suggested change (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2006OctDec/0192.html>) fix the problem for you? Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 23:06:29 UTC