W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Etag-on-write, 5th attempt (== IETF draft 04), was: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-http-etag-on-write-04.txt

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:26:13 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1164839173.15658.41.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
tis 2006-11-28 klockan 11:06 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
> Hi,
> (see below for the announcement, and 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-http-etag-on-write-04.html> 
> for an HTML version).

The principles looks very reasonable to me, but I have not checked the
details for spelling, consistency etc.

And it's good that it's not excluding weak etags, even if the current
RFC2616 makes weak etags in this context quite useless (RFC2616 14.24
and it's relatives).


Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 22:26:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:40 UTC