- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:56:09 -0500
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
It's also redefining the meaning of DELETE. On 11/4/06, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just noticed a funny requirement in Section 8.4 of > draft-ietf-simple-xcap-12 (<draft-ietf-simple-xcap-12>): > > > Before the server returns the 200 OK response to a DELETE, it MUST > > process the resource interdependencies as defined in Section 8.2.7. > > As long as the document still exists after the delete operation, any > > successful response to DELETE MUST include the entity tag of the > > document. > > Note that in this case, "document" does not refer to the thing > identified by the request URI, but to hierarchy of URIs, identifying > different parts of an XML document. > > So is it OK to return an ETag in response to a successful DELETE, when a > subsequent GET would return a 404? > > Best regards, Julian > >
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 17:56:19 UTC