- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 23:19:52 -0500
- To: "Paul Leach" <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 11/4/06, Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com> wrote: > > Which is pretty silly given that proprietary Web server applications > exist only as deployed--there is no separate "implementation". > [Paul Leach] I don't understand the above sentence. > Increasingly, software is written expressly for one website, not distributed through traditional commercial software channels such as CD-ROMs or pre-installed on new computers. This style of deployment has a lot of advantages, and the implement/configure distinction is meaningless. There is only one copy. At any rate, I believe other messages have established that the meaning of the HTTP version number field is pretty clear. I think the list should revisit this topic when everyone is prepared to accept the requirements of RFC 2616 and RFC 2145. Is there something unclear about "conditional conformance"? -- Robert Sayre
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 04:20:00 UTC