- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:02:44 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
There are lots of optimisations we could make to make it cleaner, more clearly architected, etc., but it seems to me that going down that path brings a real risk of either encountering a rat-hole, or of making things worse. E.g., If too much material is moved around, we risk disorienting implementers. I'm not sure separate docs are necessary, but if we contemplate any kind of reorg, it should be *after* all errata, etc. are agreed to and incorporated. On 2006/10/19, at 6:21 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > I think it would be a mistake to keep the document in its current form > as a monolithic document; it should be split into several documents to > make the whole thing approachable. Obvious candidates for separate > specs > would be caching, content negotiation, message format, and URL > schemes. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 01:02:56 UTC