Re: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt

I wrote to the moderator about removal.  "it sent a MESSAGE"  THAT THE 
EMAILS DO NOT ORRIGINATE FROM THE GROUP.
NOW I MUST FILE COMPLAINTS.
AS FAR AS I KNOW YOU ARE NOT IN MY BROADCAST LIST.  I AM UNABLE TO
REMOVE THIS FROM MY SYSTEM
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME HERE?

THANKS,
MAX CLARK
PRINTING EQUIPMENT/INDUSTRIAL BROKER.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: <jg@freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>; "'HTTP Working Group'" 
<ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-whitehead-http-etag-00.txt


>
> Jim Gettys wrote:
>> I did prepare a draft for full standard with all errata of the time
>> included, *and* submitted it, IIRC.
>>
>> There were no comments at the time, and there were open dependencies, so
>> it could not progress.
>>
>> I will not bother to prepare another until someone can tell me with a
>> straight face that 1) all the dependencies have made it to full
>> standard, and therefore it won't be a waste of time, 2) at least 2
>
> I just checked, and the various MIME RFCs are still at "draft", so I don't 
> think that HTTP can progress.
>
> On the other hand, I think a revised version would be usefuk, even if it 
> needs to stay at the "draft" level.
>
>> people commit to me personally they will bother to check it for
>> editorial errors.
>>
>> Even then, I don't know when I'd have time to prepare another draft.
>> Regards,
>> - Jim
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.2/274 - Release Date: 3/3/2006
>
>

Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 17:22:02 UTC