- From: i ahmed <ahmedat@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:54:08 +0500
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann you are right ________________________ http://www.letsjoy.com +9865566365 On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:46:00 +0900, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote: > > Dear HTTP experts, > > RFC 2616 currently says, in 3.4, Character Sets: > > HTTP character sets are identified by case-insensitive tokens. The > complete set of tokens is defined by the IANA Character Set registry > [19]. > > charset = token > > Although HTTP allows an arbitrary token to be used as a charset > value, any token that has a predefined value within the IANA > Character Set registry [19] MUST represent the character set defined > by that registry. Applications SHOULD limit their use of character > sets to those defined by the IANA registry. > > The references then give > > [19] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC 1700, > October 1994. > > This is a very old snapshot of the IANA charset registry, missing > a few important entries (such as UTF-8). > > Based on this, we have seen claims saying that utf-8 cannot be used > in HTTP. While I would personally consider such claims somewhere > between 'bogus' and 'doubtful', it would be great if the HTTP spec > were changed to directly point to the IANA registry if and when > updated in the future. > > Regards, Martin. > > P.S.: As a separate, but related issue, it might also be a good > idea to remove the never actually effective default of > iso-8859-1. > >
Received on Saturday, 19 February 2005 17:00:51 UTC