- From: Christian Nybø <chr@nybo.no>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:15:10 +0200
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Jun 29, 2005, at 19:43, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Nybø wrote: > >> Would you agree that on page 27, the line >> subtag = 1*8(ALPHA / DIGIT) >> should read >> subtag = 1*8(ALPHA | DIGIT) >> ? >> > > What RFC are you reading? Pardon me. Yes, I am reading the one tagged draft-gettys-http-v11- spec-rev-00. > Some kind of a "fixed" version of RFC 2616? That's it. My error. > RFC 2616 does not have the above definition for subtag. RFC 2616 > errata[1] mentions that subtag definition should be relaxed and > quotes a > new definition from RFC 3066: > > subtag = 1*8(ALPHA / DIGIT) > > That quoted definition uses the "/" separator because RFC 3066 is > using > ABNF, a different BNF notation. When the errata is integrated into the > next HTTP/1.1 RFC, the notation needs to be corrected (either in the > quoted fix or everywhere else). Then I understand. Thanks. -- chr
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2005 19:18:39 UTC