Re: poe

I like the general approach; the language needs a little adjustment 
(the last sentence could be read in the wrong way); but I think the 
sentiment is "just because you don't get a POE-Links back on an 
OPTIONS, don't assume it isn't a POE resource," which seems right (if 
unfortunate -- it would be really nice to be able to ask a resource and 
get a definitive answer!).


On Apr 1, 2005, at 3:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:

> How about this:
> POE-Links in OPTIONS responses
> Resources MAY return the POE-Links header in OPTIONS responses. POE 
> resources SHOULD announce their poe-ness by sending
> POE-Links: .
> in response to OPTIONS requests. If no POE-Links header is seen in an 
> options response, a client MUST NOT deduce anything about the poe-ness 
> of the resource.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 22:03:21 UTC