W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2004

Is forwarding hop-by-hop headers a MUST-level violation?

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:25:09 -0600 (MDT)
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407061107430.85419@measurement-factory.com>


	Some proxies forward some hop-by-hop headers. While discussing
a related Apache bugzilla entry[1], Nick Kew suggested that forwarding
a hop-by-hop header by a proxy is only a SHOULD-level violation, if it
is a violation at all.

Section 13.5.1 of RFC 2616 says:

   For the purpose of defining the behavior of caches and non-caching
   proxies, we divide HTTP headers into two categories:

      - End-to-end headers, which are  transmitted to the ultimate
        recipient of a request or response. End-to-end headers in
        responses MUST be stored as part of a cache entry and MUST be
        transmitted in any response formed from a cache entry.

      - Hop-by-hop headers, which are meaningful only for a single
        transport-level connection, and are not stored by caches or
        forwarded by proxies.

The "Hop-by-hop headers ... are not stored or forwarded" claim is not
an explicit MUST- or SHOULD-level requirement. It looks like an
assertion or definition. Given the negative impact forwarding some
hop-by-hop headers would have, I always assumed that proxies MUST NOT
forward any hop-by-hop headers. Was I wrong?

Is it worth changing the above language to a more consistent and

      - Hop-by-hop headers, which are meaningful only for a single
        transport-level connection. Hop-by-hop headers MUST NOT be
        stored by caches or forwarded by proxies.

BTW, the above "End-to-end headers" rules do not say anything about
forwarding End-to-end request headers. Perhaps the wording should be
polished to include request headers as well?



[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15861

P.S. There are other MUSTs specific to some hop-by-hop headers,
including those in Connection header list. Here, we are talking about
the general rule for all hop-by-hop headers.
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2004 13:27:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:13:25 UTC