- From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:34:12 +0100
- To: Justin Chapweske <justin@chapweske.com>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@imc.org>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Justin Chapweske wrote: > This would be another example why an explicit error reporting URI in the > response headers would be a better way to go. The system could > dynamically include unique identifiers for the generating server and > include that in the URI, and perhaps have all URIs for a cluster of > servers point a single error reporting server. It's probably obvious, but fwiw I agree. An error reporting URI, plus a standard indicating _what_ should be reported and how. Alex's point about revealing data if the report is too detailed is also important. -- Jamie
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:34:22 UTC