- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:01:55 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Heh. Effectively, yes. On May 21, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > >>> I can't find the term "static" in RFC2616... It's also not clear how >>> "generated dynamically" affects the ability to use a specific PATCH >>> format. Assuming that PATCH will only work for authorable resources >>> (those you can PUT to), could you please explain which of the set of >>> these resources you're trying to exclude? >> That's an even better wording -- authorable resources, or those you >> can PUT to. Thanks for providing specific wording. > > OK. But then this makes it "Servers SHOULD support VCDIFF on all > resources where PATCH is allowed", right? > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 17:02:13 UTC