- From: Justin Chapweske <justin@chapweske.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:45:29 -0500
- To: lisa@osafoundation.org
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hello Lisa, The PATCH proposal is interesting and well designed for the task at hand. A couple of thoughts: o I'm concerned that the provided use cases for PATCH is a bit too narrow and the system may not be flexible enough to encompass future use cases. For example, it may be desirable to create a new file that is the combination of the PATCH request body and a totally different resource, rather than patching a file in place. Another possible use case is that it may be desirable to have the patch body retrieved from a third-party URI rather than embedded directly in the request. Of course, at a quick blush you could simply say that these cases are out of scope. But, I think it is worth thinking deeper about the problem space to see if an even more generic solution doesn't arise. o Secondly, I would like to see PATCH advocate at least one generic binary delta format. Unless I am mistaken, gdiff is only useful for text documents. Thanks for your time and effort in writing this document. -Justin
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 17:48:06 UTC