- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:51:56 -0700
- To: HTTP working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Just curious - does anyone know of OPTIONS being used "in the wild" at all? If so, how? On Apr 20, 2004, at 6:21 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > > I am working on the next version of the HTTP PATCH method proposal: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dusseault-http-patch-00.txt > > We've had some discussions amongst WebDAV people of the best way for > clients to discover server feature support. In this case, the client > wants to discover: > - if the server supports PATCH at all > - if so, what delta or diff formats can be used on this resource. > > For that purpose, is a new header on OPTIONS still considered to be > the way to go? Can a server omit this header on responses to OPTIONS > * if it only supports the feature in part of its namespace? (E.g. if > a java servlet supplies support for this feature only in the namespace > hosted by that servlet) > > Any other comments on the draft are welcome as well. > > Thanks, > Lisa Dusseault > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 23:52:15 UTC