- From: Kalvinder Singh <singh@ozy.dec.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:26:36 +1000
- To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Cc: 'Marc Slemko' <marcs@znep.com>, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Yaron Goland wrote: > > Sorry, a slip on the term authenticate. A persistent connection is needed > for some of our authentication algorithms to work properly. > Do you happen to know which authentication algorithms you use that require persistent connections??? > > > > What the Proxy-Connection header has done is require that every > > proxy which can pass requests to an "upstream" proxy of some type > > know about it or be "broken". In reality, it is the concept of the > > Proxy-Connection header that is broken, but given that > > clients implement > > it and other proxies implement it, the only thing this poor little > > standards conforming proxy can do is deal with it as well. > > > > It doesn't, of course, have to do anything other than drop it from > > forwarded requests, but that still involves dealing with it. > > So does that mean that a proxy that knows about the Proxy-Connection header should remove it from the request message and should not try to set up a persistent connection??? Or is there another way that you can deal with it??? Cheers, Kal. -- . Kalvinder Singh singh@ozy.dec.com _-_|\ Software Engineering Australia / \<-- Compaq \_.-._/ Research Park, Bond University Phone: +61 7 5575 0106 v Gold Coast, Qld, 4229, Australia Fax: +61 7 5575 0100
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 1999 22:10:08 UTC