- From: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:12:03 -0800
- To: Ross Patterson <ROSSP@ss1.reston.vmd.sterling.com>
- Cc: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> In section 13.12 "Cache Replacement", the statement > > "If it inserts the new response into cache storage it > SHOULD follow the rules in section 13.5.3." > > could be construed as downgrading several MUSTs in 13.5.3 to SHOULDs. > The "SHOULD" should either be replaced with "should" or this requirement > should be upgraded to a "MUST". > I think the right solution is to rewrite this sentence to be: "If it inserts the new response into cache storage the rules in section 13.5.3 apply." - Jim
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 1998 10:17:20 UTC