- From: Ross Patterson <ROSSP@ss1.reston.vmd.sterling.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 98 10:43:03 EST
- To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
In section 4.2 "Message Headers", the statement "Applications SHOULD follow "common form", where one is known or indicated, when generating HTTP constructs, since there might exist some implementations that fail to accept anything beyond the common forms." is so vague as to be impossible to measure, and should therefore not be normative and a requirement of compliance. I've brought this one up before, so if the general opinion goes against me I won't complain. Ross Patterson VM Software Division Sterling Software, Inc.
Received on Monday, 9 November 1998 09:11:08 UTC