- From: Ross Patterson <ROSSP@SS1.Reston.VMD.Sterling.COM>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 98 12:01:41 EST
- To: http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys) writes: >Empty message. What was the complaint? Hmm, that's two people who've reported that some of those notes came through empty. Here's the original note for this one. >In section 4.2 "Message Headers", the statement > > "Applications SHOULD follow "common form", where one is known or > indicated, when generating HTTP constructs, since there might > exist some implementations that fail to accept anything beyond the > common forms." > >is so vague as to be impossible to measure, and should therefore not be >normative and a requirement of compliance. I've brought this one up >before, so if the general opinion goes against me I won't complain. Ross Patterson VM Software Division Sterling Software, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 1998 17:07:33 UTC