- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 14:51:06 -0700
- To: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Cc: 'Dave Kristol' <dmk@bell-labs.com>, http-wg@hplb.hpl.hp.com
>How about I say that URI in "domain=URI..." must be an "http_UTL" or >"abs_path" as defined in section 3.2.2 of the HTTP/1.1 spec? >The former is the usual "http://www.xxx.com:port/dir/foo.html" type; the >latter is "/dir/foo.html". It's odd that it isn't relative to the requested resource. Has someone checked the implementations to see what is normally returned? In any case, "http_URL" is too restrictive. That should be "absoluteURI", since it would allow for the use of HTTP with different schemes (think http, https, ipp, ...). ....Roy
Received on Friday, 7 August 1998 15:28:04 UTC