Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested'

>Concerning the low implemented list:
>    H 10.1.2 101 Switching Protocols
>    H 14.42  Upgrade
>I'm not sure what there is to implement here... If any server does
>implement these, then what do they accept in the Upgrade header?

Personally, I find it incredibly shortsighted for the IETF not to
include a special exception for optional features intended to support
future protocol extensions and/or replacement.  I'd hate to have to
exclude good engineering practice just to call it a draft standard.


Received on Sunday, 29 March 1998 01:10:39 UTC