W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 1998

Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 11:14:29 -0800
To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
Message-Id: <9802051118.aa28833@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/5340

Is there any way to say the same thing without referring to "identity"
as a transfer coding?  It is far less confusing to say "no transfer coding",
in my opinion.

....Roy

Received on Thursday, 5 February 1998 12:23:22 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ben Laurie: "Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH"
Previous message: Life is hard... and then you die.: "Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH"
In reply to: Jeffrey Mogul: "proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH"
Reply: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: proposed solution for CONTENT-LENGTH"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC