>E-mail does not permit content-transfer-encoding of a multipart, >only of individual parts, I believe. I was only referring to single parts. The message type has its own encoding restrictions, which is why it may be more appropriate to recommend use of "application/http" even though the semantics of "message/http" seemed like the right choice at the time. This is actually fairly important, since it determines the most likely method of performing WebDAV operations via E-mail. The other advantage of "application/http" is that it can be defined as a pipeline of requests or a pipeline of responses. ....RoyReceived on Thursday, 29 January 1998 17:42:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:04 UTC