- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 22:42:00 +0000
- To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Adrien de Croy wrote: > I would have thought that in a random data stream, the chances of any > particular 4 byte sequence would have been 1 in 4 Billion, but we are only > looking at the last 4 bytes before a close. So, given there is only one > close per session, there is only one inspected 4 byte sequence, hence the > chance of any one file causing confusion over an OEF marker is 1 in 4 billion. Sorry, my mistake, I was taking into account the below, which means you'd have to check every byte. > However, as pointed out by John Franks, this method would not, and cannot > allow for multiple transactions per connection, since it relies on the close > event being a signal as well. > > However, reflecting more on that issue, the chances of a client requiring > multiple created entitities (i.e those where the server cannot know a priori > the size) in a single connection is rather low, at least at the moment. > Multiple normal requests per connection would still be possible, and > unaffected by this proposal. It'd have to server the created entity last, which seems unlikely. Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686|Apache Group member Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |Apache-SSL author A.L. Digital Ltd, |http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
Received on Thursday, 29 January 1998 15:16:54 UTC