- From: David W. Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 15:57:51 -0800 (PST)
- To: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- cc: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>, "'ietf-http-wg@w3.org'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Wed, 31 Dec 1997, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > In either case, imbeded LWS must be allowed to follow the spirit of > > possibly continued header values and headers which may be too long. > > > > Also, they encoding rule should probably be something like: > > > > 1. Compose the subset of headers to be digested > > 2. Combine into a single string with CR/LF between headers > > 3. Encode the whole string. > > Isn't that exactly what Jeffrey was suggesting? Probably ... I believe it is the spirit of his suggestion but what I recall from when I read the original is that I was attempting to be more precise in working toward spec wording. Dave Morris
Received on Wednesday, 31 December 1997 19:01:34 UTC