- From: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 18:45:01 -0600 (CST)
- To: Jeffrey Mogul <mogul@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
On Fri, 12 Dec 1997, Jeffrey Mogul wrote: > > If a message is sent on a persistent connection using > a transfer-coding that does not exactly preserve the > length of the data being encoding, then the "chunked" > transfer-coding MUST be used, and MUST be the last > transfer-coding applied. > Is there a reason to require that chunked be applied after a self-delimiting transfer encoding? There would be a (probably slight) performance penality for doing it and I don't see the purpose. John Franks john@math.nwu.edu
Received on Friday, 12 December 1997 16:46:24 UTC