- From: Scott Lawrence <lawrence@agranat.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 1997 12:07:29 -0500
- To: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-http@w3.org
The fifth HTTP/1.1 Multi-Vendor Internet Test Day is Dec 4. !!! We do have at least one 1.1 proxy for this week !!! This is the last test day before the December IETF - don't miss the chance. If you plan to participate, please register by filling out the survey form at the end of this mail, and sending it to 'httptest@agranat.com' by your close of business on Tuesday, Dec 2. I will combine them and forward them as a single mailing on Wednesday to all who signed up. If you will have multiple instances of the same implementation and configuration active, send that as one registration; if you will have different implementations or configurations active please send those separately so that it is clear just what each active system should be. ================================================================ Note: There is an updated list of continuously available test sites at: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Forum/#Test Send me a note to update that list. ================================================================ All are welcome, including 1.0 implementations (testing backward compatibility is important too). Test Day Ground Rules: - Participating systems may be configured to allow access only by announced participants for that week (if you will be using a dynamically assigned IP address, indicate this and try to specify the range from which it will be chosen). - Participants will, on request, make a reasonable effort to provide whatever relevant log or trace data they have to other participants to resolve problems. - If a problem or possible issue with another participant implementation is found, that issue will be communicated to the contact for that implementation promptly. Only if the involved participants disagree on the correct behavior or if the involved participants agree to do so will the issue be brought to the working group mailing list. - Any other disclosure of problems found with other implementations during these tests is poor form. - Communicating positive results to other participants is strongly encouraged. Additional suggestions welcome. ================================================================ Organization: User-Agent or Server string: (may be approximate) HTTP Role: [origin, proxy, tunnel, client, robot, ...] HTTP Version: Address: (DNS host names and/or IP addresses for the HTTP implementation) Time: (GMT times the system will be active or available) Contact Name: (person to contact with an issue) Contact Email: Contact Phone: Contact Hours: (GMT times the contact is available, should overlap the span in Time, but may be a subset) Notes: other relevant information, possibly including URLs for information on where to find background material. -- Scott Lawrence EmWeb Embedded Server <lawrence@agranat.com> Agranat Systems, Inc. Engineering http://www.agranat.com/
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 1997 09:10:53 UTC