- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 10:21:40 -0800
- To: "'jg@pa.dec.com'" <jg@pa.dec.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Oh ick. Not to be too excessive of a fuddy duddy but the term Request-URI has been used for a very long time, changing the meaning is guaranteed to confuse a whole bunch o'folks. I would suggest that this cat is out of the bag and we are just going to have to live with it. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: jg@pa.dec.com [SMTP:jg@pa.dec.com] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 7:56 AM > To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Editorial suggestion to change Request-URI to Request-Target > > Roy suggests this editorial change for future drafts (i.e. we don't plan > to make it for Rev-01. > - Jim > > > Actually, when I was writing the OPTIONS stuff I realized that a lot > > of gunky definitions could be cleaned up by a global replace of > > > > Request-URI ===> Request-Target > > > > and then use the term Request-URI to refer to "the resource indicated > > by a full URI in Request-Target or by the combination of Request-Target > > and Host". Something to keep in mind for draft XX : XX > 01. > > > > ....Roy
Received on Monday, 17 November 1997 12:24:54 UTC