- From: Josh <josh@early.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 20:42:01 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jim Gettys <jg@pa.dec.com>
- Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
The consensus from our lunch meeting was that as long as proxies upgrade all requests to the proxy's highest version number, then the re-version issue could stay as it is. Response version is the servers highest version, not the message version. While the message version would have merit, it seems that people felt that at this point we couldnt justify changing it. The only remaining fringe case which I can think of where there may be problems are with the example of the chunked post. I dont think we can solve that easily. I propose an edit like this in the version clauses. "Proxy servers MUST upgrade all requests to the highest version supported by the proxy" According to Jim Gettys, > > > There were a set of people who were going to discuss this > in the halls, and get back to me (and the working group) > with a resolution. > > I've never seen any resolution. No one caught me in the hall. > > People involved included Josh and Henry Sanders. > > Please identify yourselves, and the proposed solution. > - Jim Gettys > -- --- Josh Cohen josh@early.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 1997 17:46:46 UTC