- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 16:46:20 PDT
- To: hardie@nic.nasa.gov
- Cc: Dave Kristol <dmk@research.bell-labs.com>, http-state@lists.research.bell-labs.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
I suggested the split myself as a way of determining consensus independently and serially. It also allows one document to be revised, if necessary, without touching the other. It might be that we could combine the documents before they issue as an RFC, but it's important to separate the technical aspects from the political ones to make progress. Larry -- http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter
Received on Friday, 10 October 1997 16:51:33 UTC