- From: Graham Klyne <GK@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 09:23:24 +0100
- To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
The following thoughts emerged from an off-line discussion about the use of quality factors in content negiatiation. The premise for what follows is the assertion that the only practical use for a quality factor is to rank some set of alternatives according to preference. Simple sequencing of of alternatives (e.g. per Multipart/Alternative) may not be possible because the sender may not be able to locate (hence present) the alternatives in order of quality. Therefore some separate ranking mechanism is required. I suggest that in this case a 3-digit (max) number is insufficient, as with a significant number of alternatives an implementation will soon run out of space within which to slot further entries between existing entries. I estimate that a perverse presentation would run out ranking space after about 10 entries (log2(1001)). BEGIN COMMENT Why log2(1001)? Assume that the alternatives are discovered by the sender in some arbitrary order, and that the sender must allocate quality factor values to rank the alternatives as they are discovered. (e.g. information about each alternative is being sent out as soon the alternative is discovered.) Then each new q-factor allocation must be placed between the q-factors of some existing pair of alternatives (where 0 and 1 are notional initial entries). Without any prior knowledge of the order in which entries will be presented, each new q-factor should be allocated mid-way between the q-factors of its immediate ranking predecessor and successor, hence dividing the available ranking space by 2. Assuming a worst-case order of presentation, when the n'th alternative has been ranked, the remaining available ranking space next to that entry is reduced to approximately 2^(-n) of the original ranking space. The original ranking space available using a number in [0,1] with three-digit precision contains 1001 possible values. When 1001*2^(-n) is less than 1, no more values are available in the ranking space (under the assumption of worst-case presentation order). 1001 * 2^(-n) < 1 [take base2 logs] => log2(1001) + (-n) < 0 => n > log2(1001) (corresponds to no remaining ranking space) END COMMENT GK. --- ------------ Graham Klyne GK@ACM.ORG
Received on Thursday, 9 October 1997 01:37:32 UTC