W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

RE: Last-Modified in chunked footer

From: Henry Sanders (Exchange) <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 11:22:51 -0700
Message-Id: <7D9A01DBBFD5CF11AD0F0000F8411F8A96FB54@ROADKILL>
To: 'Scott Lawrence' <lawrence@agranat.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4288 
> LM> I don't think we can continue to evalute these one-by-one, though.
> LM> Is there some general principle to apply?
> 
>   If the value of the header field may be dependant on the content,
>   then it might be desirable to send that field in the trailer.
> 
What do we say about trailers on chunked PUTs? There are fields that
depend on the content (like Content-Type) that a server handling a PUT
might want to see early on.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 1997 11:26:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC