W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

RE: Last-Modified in chunked footer

From: Henry Sanders (Exchange) <henrysa@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 11:22:51 -0700
Message-Id: <7D9A01DBBFD5CF11AD0F0000F8411F8A96FB54@ROADKILL>
To: 'Scott Lawrence' <lawrence@agranat.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4288
> LM> I don't think we can continue to evalute these one-by-one, though.
> LM> Is there some general principle to apply?
>   If the value of the header field may be dependant on the content,
>   then it might be desirable to send that field in the trailer.
What do we say about trailers on chunked PUTs? There are fields that
depend on the content (like Content-Type) that a server handling a PUT
might want to see early on. 
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 1997 11:26:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC