> I think the key here is that British usage might tend towards > "cacheable", although my OED is at home so I can't check that > while I write this. > > However: in draft -08 (and in RFC2068), "cacheable" appears only > once, and "cachable" appears dozens of times. I vote to stick > with "cachable." > > -Jeff > But we're not dealing strictly with english here. "cache" is a french word and if you want an authority then we should turn to the Academie. "cachable" it ain't. The choice has to be between "cache-able" and "cacheable", the former preferred in order to preserve the french stem. bob We don't need another "referer".Received on Tuesday, 2 September 1997 11:40:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC