Re: 301/302

On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Ben Laurie wrote:

> 
> OK. It still seems to me that the correct thing to do is to fix CGI. A
> simple thing to do would be to add a version header:
> 
> CGI-Version: 1.1
> 
> Absence of the header means the script is 1.0 compliant. This is not an
> HTTP header - the server would strip it, I assume, and doctor other
> headers as needed.
> 

The current (widely deployed) version of CGI is called version 1.1.
This has nothing to do with HTTP versions.  Thus something other
than "CGI-Version: 1.1" would be advisable to avoid confusion.

John Franks 	Dept of Math. Northwestern University
		john@math.nwu.edu