- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:47:07 +0100
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Cc: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Larry Masinter wrote: > > Why, you could have different configuration directives, so that > .cgi files would be HTTP/1.0 and .cgi11 files would be HTTP/1.1, > or .asp would be HTTP/1.0 and .asq would be HTTP/1.1, etc. > > It's easy for servers to have a mechanism for determining if > a script is 1.0 or 1.1. True, and we could have decided that there was no point in having version numbers in HTTP, because we could just have a naming covention for servers, www.* == HTTP/0.9, www10.* == HTTP/1.0, www11.* == HTTP/1.1. It may work, but its junk. Cheers, Ben. -- Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435 Email: ben@algroup.co.uk Freelance Consultant and Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472 Technical Director URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL A.L. Digital Ltd, Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org) London, England. Apache-SSL author
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 1997 10:48:52 UTC