W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: 301/302

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 08:35:32 PDT
Message-Id: <33DF5F44.5556@parc.xerox.com>
To: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Cc: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/4009

Why, you could have different configuration directives, so that
.cgi files would be HTTP/1.0 and .cgi11 files would be HTTP/1.1,
or .asp would be HTTP/1.0 and .asq would be HTTP/1.1, etc.

It's easy for servers to have a mechanism for determining if
a script is 1.0 or 1.1.

Larry

Received on Wednesday, 30 July 1997 08:38:06 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: New Editorial issue MESSAGE-BODY"
Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Cutoff for Draft 08 of the HTTP/1.1 spec."
In reply to: Ben Laurie: "Re: 301/302"
Next in thread: David W. Morris: "Re: 301/302"
Reply: David W. Morris: "Re: 301/302"
Reply: Ben Laurie: "Re: 301/302"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC