W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997


From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 22:18:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199707282018.WAA20230@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3965

About the CONTENT-ENCODING issue which is now in last call: I do not
think the draft should be changes in the proposed way.

The issue is not whether the `original authors of 1.0' intended, but
forgot to, add q parameters to content encoding.  I don't think so,
but we do not need to discuss that.

The issue is whether q parameters can be added now without breaking too
many things.

Roy's message


seems to indicate that adding q parameters might well lead to breakage.

Without some degree of evidence that this breakage *won't* occur, I
think that going through with the CONTENT-ENCODING fix is ill-advised.

The evidence does not have to be exhaustive, but it has to be better
than what I have seen so far.  I argue against making this change in
parsing rules, because we do not understand its possible effects well

Received on Monday, 28 July 1997 13:19:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:03 UTC