W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 1997

Re: Is 100-Continue hop-by-hop?

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:03:29 -0700
To: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <9707111713.aa09590@paris.ics.uci.edu>
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/3745
>But I guess that what he actually had in mind was 
>  <copy request> <100 response about progress=50%> <100 response about
>  progress=100%> <200 OK response to copy request>
>And this latter case would indeed work through a multiplexing proxy
>(though the code would have to be 101 or something, with semantics
>slightly different from 100). 

101 is already being used, but yes it would definitely have to be
a new 1xx code.  Extensibility is meant to be used.

Received on Friday, 11 July 1997 18:22:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:02 UTC