- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 13:34:54 -0700
- To: "'hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov'" <hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov>, koen@win.tue.nl, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com
I am all in favor of an information RFC documenting how cookies are implemented today, which covers your concerns Ted. Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov > [SMTP:hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov] > Sent: Friday, July 11, 1997 1:25 PM > To: koen@win.tue.nl; Yaron Goland; http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com > Cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com > Subject: Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " > to Propo > > Yaron Goland asked: > > > > > >Who intends to implement it? > > Koen Holtman replied: > > The lynx people. See the recent message by Foteos Macrides in this > > thread. > > > > I am also aware of several efforts to use this mechanism > in the context of lightweight no-human user agents. One > of these, being done by a different group within NASA, will > be using the lightweight state information available through > cookies to maintain information about what image data sets > have been received from and passed to different reporting > stations. Having cookies available lets the interacting > servers know that which sets are complete without having > to query on each image in each sets; it makes for a nice > cheap short cut. > > I believe that cookies are in widespread use in passing > just this kind of shortcut information. Repairing the existing > State Management Mechanism is important for interoperability; > we want to make sure everyone is using the same standard > to create this kind of application. Even if those applications > would work fine with the original Netscape docs, having a standards > track doc is important. > > It is being Proposed; if it does not receive adequate implementation > support, it will not move on. That's okay. But we shouldn't short > circuit the process by assuming that it's dead because two vendors > won't be updating to it. The browser market is not the same as the > useful field of play for internet protocols. > > regards, > Ted Hardie > NASA NIC
Received on Friday, 11 July 1997 13:38:25 UTC