W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: HTTP header suggestion/request

From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 05:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611081354.FAA29676@server.livingston.com>
To: Benjamin Franz <snowhare@netimages.com>
Cc: megazone@livingston.com, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-talk@w3.org, http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com
X-Mailing-List: <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> archive/latest/1892
Once upon a time Benjamin Franz shaped the electrons to say...
>most sites that do this do. There is no real reason to feed it out of the
>script itself. This also allows you to try to load balance download sites

Yes there is - lawyers.  They wanted it so that there was no way to the
file except via the script which contains a licensing agreement.  Redirecting
to another URL would allow that URL to leak and people to get the code

Yes - cookies could maintain state - and exclude a lot of people.

Note replies redirected to www-talk@w3.org so we stop bothering the WG.

Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway  #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Friday, 8 November 1996 06:01:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:00 UTC